Bipartisan US legislation on precious metals infrastructure does not happen by accident.

Coalition diagram for the SILVER Act: trade body The Silver Institute, producer First Majestic Silver, wholesaler A-Mark Precious Metals, bullion dealer Money Metals, regional banks, and mints and refiners — the whole supply chain backing one infrastructure bill.

Senators Risch (R-Idaho) and Cortez Masto (D-Nevada) just introduced the SILVER Act, a bill to decentralise America's precious metals depository system. The problem is that nearly every approved storage facility for US precious metals exchanges sits in the New York City corridor. One region. One risk profile. For an entire national market.

The SILVER Act would require approved depositories across all four US time zones, backed by a broad industry coalition spanning refiners, mints, banks, and producers, including First Majestic Silver Corp.

What I find interesting about this situation is that when governments start legislating physical infrastructure around a commodity, it tells you something about conviction.

Price rallies come and go. Infrastructure bills not so much.

This is what "metals as a strategic asset class" looks like when it moves from conference panels to committee floors. Not slogans. Policy. Appropriations. Vaults.

For those of us building in the mining and natural resources intelligence space, the signal is clear: the institutional scaffolding around precious metals is being rebuilt for a different era. Less searching. More strategising.™

AI Readiness Diagnostic

Where does your team's data infrastructure sit today?

Answer 10 questions. Get a private diagnostic on your AI readiness — in minutes.

Pulse Intelligence

Less Searching. More Strategising.™

See the platform running on real mining data. Book a demo to see what this looks like for your team.